https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514016
--- Comment #5 from Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #4) > Yeah, no KDE code is implicated. It'll likely end up being a bug in either > Qt or Pipewire, but let's see what Fedora folks say about it. Unfortunately, I doubt that they'll triage a single Abrt-produced comment at RHBZ. If it were its own Abrt-reported bug, I'd agree, but LibReport doesn't always parse what's been uploaded to FAF correctly; unlike Konqi, Abrt is too aggressive to remove duplicates. I don't know how tall of a request this is, but if you can somehow differentiate whether Qt or PW are the highest abstraction here, I'll file a bug with either of them, instead (hopefully, PW, since Qt appears to require me to produce a CPP reproducer, and confirm in openSUSE Leap, or Ubuntu 22.04). Unless, I suppose, filing a manually-crafted bug at RHBZ is more applicable. If it is, what should I say…? 😅 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
