https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340982
--- Comment #316 from RJVB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to phil4000n from comment #314) > Then it's a commitment issue to start It should be plain for everyone to see that this would long have been solved if it were either more than a cosmetic issue, or if it wasn't so expensive to fix. Is anything actually broken in the sense that people get the wrong date (rather than just the wrong formatting) or erroneous durations, missed appointments, etc? Maybe Nate could give an estimate of the number of man-hours required to address this properly, including the testing required if no regressions are being introduced *anywhere*. Oh, and convincing the maintainers of all the libraries, frameworks etc. to incorporate the changes as indispensable... (Wondering how many people complaining on this ticket are perfectly happy working on software that's inevitably written in US English...!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
