https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374940

--- Comment #8 from Matthias Urlichs <sm...@smurf.noris.de> ---
(In reply to Julian Seward from comment #6)

> Why does libev have to be non-conforming in this way?  There are plenty of
> other packages that do high-performance thread stuff and I've never heard
> of any of them doing anything like this.

I have no idea, and the author does not want to use this bug to discuss the
issue.

FWIW, the libev mailing list is at
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/libev

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to