https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486180
--- Comment #12 from Paul Floyd <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 190845 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=190845&action=edit Remove IP_AT_SYSCALL Initial version. Several more things to do before landing this: 1. Check all of the commented offsets. I'm sure that there are some mistakes. 2. Test on Darwin! 3. Add some static asserts for the sizes of the structs (like the %16 ones that are already there. 4. Check whether the 'padding' members need to be initialised. 5. Do some more checking of the alignment, with static asserts and/or pahole. I'm pretty sure that the compiler will use the "largest struct member" as the default granularity, which is the right thing. Above all I want to check that the V128 members are correctly aligned. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
