https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517428
--- Comment #8 from Christoph Cullmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to bonereader from comment #6) > Just another detail to be considered: The KatePart documentation for Syntax > Highlighting > (https://docs.kde.org/stable_kf6/en/kate/katepart/highlight.html) > unfortunately describes the XML structure the way it is implemented and not > like it is defined in the XSD. So changing the code to comply with the XSD > may break exiting private highlighting definitions. It would also mean that > the documentation needed to be changed as well. > > I'm not an expert in that, but I suppose changing the XSD and adapting the > view "official" highlighting definitions that use that feature would be > easier. Eliminating the "ignored" attribute would be bad however, as the > LaTeX example shows - except if one allowed empty "char" attributes. Could you test if the current code works as expected? A missing char attribute implies that the sequence is ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
