https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523061
Arjen Hiemstra <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CONFIRMED --- Comment #4 from Arjen Hiemstra <[email protected]> --- As an update on this, the KCM was changed to not require this any more. However, the original issue remains where it's not possible for Union to determine the implicit size of invisible controls. I did do some investigation as to why. Union uses a custom layout for placing the sub-elements of a control. This layout checks if an item is visible or not, if it is not visible the entire item is skipped. This behaivour matches that of QtQuick Layouts. However, where things differ is that QtQuick layouts check for explicitly set visibility, which we can't in Union, as that is only available in the private details of a QtQuick item. So this is going to be quite tricky to implement correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
