https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378814
Martin Klapetek <mklape...@kde.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |mklape...@kde.org Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Martin Klapetek <mklape...@kde.org> --- Hey Corentin, thanks for getting in touch! I think we're pretty much in the same boat but opposite streams - we'd prefer to keep using the Qt daemon and Qt libraries, rather. For us it's much easier to work with and also fix bugs in a Qt codebase, which is our primary language after all. I agree that the Canonical situation is a very unfortunate one but given that the Qt daemon is working well for our needs, I don't really see the need to switch techs. My understanding is that GSignond is not actually compatible with the Signond, is that correct? If that's the case, I would really wish that these two are brought together more closer, to be compatible and interchangeable. Then we could both keep our native daemons while having fully cross-desktop accounts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.