https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343099
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schultz <aschu...@tpip.net> --- The unshare syscall (bug #166355) mentioned by Tom Hughes has been added a long time ago. I there any argument against adding setns that would not have been applied to unshare as well? Or in other words, what I can do to get this change merged? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
