https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389674
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Vogt <fab...@ritter-vogt.de> --- (In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #6) > (In reply to Fabian Vogt from comment #5) > > Ok. If you have an idea already and it sounds plausible you could make a > > patch > > for verification which I might be able to test tomorrow as well. > > If my theory is correct it'll be difficult to patch, unfortunately. > > The Device* is passed as signal argument, but I fear the signal gets queued. > If now in another thread the device gets destroyed, we call deleteLater on > the Device and then we get into the crash situation. I guess I could verify this by building kwin without the device->deleteLater call then. However, why is there a device remove event in the first place? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
