https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396290
--- Comment #15 from Roger Light <ro...@atchoo.org> --- Thanks for the comments and review. I think adding greater capability for controlling where and when failures occur, and adding syscall support could turn this into a really useful tool. I don't think that should take away from there already is though. How about renaming to "failcheck" for example, and rewriting a load of the text to make it clear the tool is about failure checking in general and at the moment considers heap allocation failures, then expanding the scope once you are happy with everything as it stands. Ivo, I'm annoyed I missed the whitespace, I do pay attention to that sort of thing. For af_instrument, you just mean the 4 spaces indentation instead of 3, nothing to do with the function arguments? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
