https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397340
--- Comment #10 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #9) > Maik, > > Yes, this last idea is sound better. So the file modification time-stamp in > DB is a resume of item or xmp sidecar change. One entry in DB for both. > Right ? Yes exactly. > What's happen if image change and not xmp sidecar, and if we write to xmp > side car only ? This case cannot be managed ? If digiKam changes the image data also metadata will be written, that's ok. But if the image is changed externally, we would not notice, because we only look for the sidecar. Backup excepted, the solution of Karl is probably the best. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
