https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417427
--- Comment #3 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> ---
The following patch seems to clean up most of the issues:
Fix for regression error
---
coregrind/m_sigframe/sigframe-ppc64-linux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/coregrind/m_sigframe/sigframe-ppc64-linux.c
b/coregrind/m_sigframe/
sigframe-ppc64-linux.c
index 0406f3c..b54c4e0 100644
--- a/coregrind/m_sigframe/sigframe-ppc64-linux.c
+++ b/coregrind/m_sigframe/sigframe-ppc64-linux.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ struct rt_sigframe {
vki_siginfo_t info;
struct vg_sig_private priv;
UChar abigap[288]; // unused
-};
+} __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
#define SET_SIGNAL_LR(zztst, zzval) \
do { tst->arch.vex.guest_LR = (zzval); \
--
2.7.4
With this patch the number of regression errors is reduced to:
== 649 tests, 6 stderr failures, 3 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, 2
stdou\
tB failures, 2 post failures ==
gdbserver_tests/nlgone_abrt (stdoutB)
gdbserver_tests/nlpasssigalrm (stdoutB)
memcheck/tests/bug340392 (stderr)
memcheck/tests/leak_cpp_interior (stderr)
memcheck/tests/linux/rfcomm (stderr)
memcheck/tests/vcpu_fnfns (stdout)
memcheck/tests/vcpu_fnfns (stderr)
massif/tests/new-cpp (post)
massif/tests/overloaded-new (post)
none/tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_06_part3 (stdout)
none/tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_06_part3 (stderr)
none/tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part2 (stdout)
none/tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part2 (stderr)
Continuing to look at what additional changes are needed. But it looks like a
start.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
