https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420492
--- Comment #12 from David Hurka <david.hu...@mailbox.org> --- @Albert, Kezik: I think that both your views don’t are ultimately right. It’s not that something clearly broke, neither is it that nothing broke. When Kezik implemented the smooth scroll feature, the funktional feature set of Okular didn’t change. It just looks a bit better now. Let us say, scrolling has more “wow” now. Now it turns out that Okular performs worse at fast scrolling. Again, the functional feature set of Okular didn’t change. It is just a bit slower now. Let us say, fast scrolling has less “wow” now. So I think that no one strictly needs to fix this now. I also don’t think that we shouldn’t do anything now. I think we should evaluate the improvements and regressions, and how we could fix the regressions, and whether it is worth the work. I suggest to look at QScroller, to investigate why it doesn’t scroll fast enough. But I fear that its arithmetics implicate some limit, so it would be much work to fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
