https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345655
--- Comment #15 from sven.kel...@gmail.com ---
Hi Thomas,
I'm not sure in which order I did enter the date for the example. Tehrefore I
try to reproduce the scenarios:
the numbers stay same:
Name "Stock B"
amount = 0,649
price/share = 157,689
refund commission -2,44 (used wrong German term provision)
Sum automatically filled: 99,90
(However actual value (w/o rouding) 99,900161)
-----------
Scenario A:
1.) I entered the data in the Invest account:
2.) entering transaction in check account:
(investment transaction already shown here)
category investment
amount 99,90
--------------
3.) I match the two transactions
"KMM has matched the transaction (result above)"
4.) seems(!) to have matched correctly now
5.) modified Note in check account Scenario A
--> exclamation mark has missing assignment 0,00
##########
Scenario B:
1.) enter check account
2.) enter invest account
3.) save:
* Anzahl Anteile auf Wert der Split-Buchung „T000000000000000019“ gesetzt.
* Mögliches Problem mit Investitionen/Währungen
* Für die Investition 'Test invest' ist am Eröffnungsdatum '2015-03-01' kein
Wert festgesetzt.
Bitte geben die den Wert der Investition am Tag der Eröffnung an.
Beendet: 1 Problem behoben. 1 Problem noch vorhanden.
4.) back to check acount and matching:
-->failure
value of split transactions for check in conflict: (-99,90, -99,90)
############
Scenario C:
1.) enter invest account
2.) save
--> error missing assignment of 0,00
3.) enter check account
4.) match
--> transaction matched, but exclamation mark persists (missing assignment of
0,00)
############
As you could see, it is not so easy to see a straight forward behaviour which
is easily repeadable.
However I tried my best. please find the matching file below.
Thanks Sven
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
