https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422225

--- Comment #8 from Eduardo <eduponto...@gmail.com> ---
Hi people, thanks to the comments

(In reply to disuser from comment #2)
> I have just checked it with the data you provided:
> 
> x: (0; 0,37; 0,5)
> y: (0; 20; 25)
> 
> There are two variables (columns) of Numeric type (x, y) with three cases
> (rows) each. And I got virtually the same results in both LabPlot and in
> Libreoffice:
> 
> LabPlot:
> c₀ = 0.00241456±0.011553 (478 %)
>  (t statistic: 0.209, p value: 0.869, conf. interval: -0.14438 .. 0.149209)
> c₁ = 0.508915±0.0321703 (6.32 %)
>  (t statistic: 15.8, p value: 0.0402, conf. interval: 0.100152 .. 0.917678)
> 
> Libreoffice:
> c₀ = 0.00241456 = intercept(y,x)
> c₁ = 0.50891530 = slope(y,x)
> 
> However, if I don't reduce the default number of cases (rows) from one
> hundred to three, LabPlot gives me the following estimates:
> 
> Parameters:
> c₀ = 2.57031e-05±0.000122982 (478 %)
>  (t statistic: 0.209, p value: 0.835, conf. interval: -0.000218351 ..
> 0.000269757)
> c₁ = 0.514287±0.00197717 (0.384 %)
>  (t statistic: 260, p value: 0, conf. interval: 0.510363 .. 0.518211)

disuser you probably have used the values

x: (0; 0,37; 0,5)
y: (0; 0,20; 0,25)

But the problem that i can see, as reported by Alexander Semke, is 

1. first row recognize data type as integer and change x = 0,37 by x = 0

2. fill all rows with 0 (look a print screen in attachment) and does not matter
what kind of data type is in the following.

Should i change the status to resolved?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to