https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364749

            Bug ID: 364749
           Summary: parser support for Blocks please
           Product: kdevelop
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: NOR
         Component: Language Support: CPP (Clang-based)
          Assignee: kdevelop-bugs-n...@kde.org
          Reporter: rjvber...@gmail.com

I'm seeing countless warnings of the type 

```
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 void (^)()
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 NSProgressUnpublishingHandler
(^)(NSProgress *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 NSProgressUnpublishingHandler
(^)(NSProgress *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 void (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 void (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 void (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
kdevelop.plugins.clang: Unhandled type: 102 BOOL (^)(id, NSUInteger, BOOL *)
```

which are undoubtedly due to header files from OS X system SDKs (it would help
if the warning message printed the incriminated file and line number).

Would it be very hard to implement some kind of support for this CXType?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to