https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433423
--- Comment #6 from mahikeulbody <digi...@donaflor.fr> --- I don't speak english natively. But in this case it is not matter of language or translation, it is matter of logic : since I am using Digikam with the same language as IPTC standard (english) it seems logical to label an UI metadata field as the corresponding metadata standard name, which is creator in this case (into the XMP Editor) and not byline. > The creator in the advanced search does not necessarily have anything to do > with it. This entry in the DB can also come from "XMP.dc.creator" or others. You are absolutely right (I forgot that). As a consequence it may be not easy to use if the UI label of the search field don't reflect all possible sources when they have different names across standards (EXIF, IIM, XMP). In my case, as I never use IIM fields, I was not aware of the IIM name of the creator so I searched a little bit before to understand it was byline and not the same name as the XMP metadata field. > According to Wikipedia, "IPTC" is the short form and most commonly used for > "IPTC-IIM", so OK. I agree but this way many people continue to believe there is a standard from IPTC organization and another one from Adobe. Instead of understand that one (IIM) is a LEGACY standard which should not be used anymore for new photos and that BOTH standards are managed by the same organization (IPTC). Anyway my comment was a"BTW comment" so I don't really care, I just though that Digiakm could help to educate the mass ;-) > I would only change it in the XMP area after the release of digiKam-7.2.0 > because I don't know how quickly the translators would adapt it to other > languages. I understand. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
