https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431223
--- Comment #7 from Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> --- (In reply to Dominik Haumann from comment #6) > I second that: Without Kate being able to access arbitrary tools, Kate's > functionality will be very limited, and we'll get bug reports about it. > > Packaging git is not the correct approach. Can't access to the system simply > be granted somehow? No, you can't get access to the system binaries. We can remove kate from flatpak if you want, but yes, packging git and all the dependencies kate needs is the correct approach, kate needs git, so kate has to include git (or the base-kde-runtime it uses would need to include git, but it doesn't because it doesn't make sense). how can otherwise kate know that git is available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
