https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437838
--- Comment #8 from pierre-henri.wuille...@lip6.fr --- (In reply to Arjen Hiemstra from comment #3) > What's the use case? Adaptive range is only a fallback when no maximum is > known, like for network speed which doesn't really have a correct maximum. > In all other cases, having a proper range is better. Dear Arjen, Actually, with 48 CPU, proper range is not better. In this case, an adpatative scale is much more efficient because the amplitudes are very large and the maximum is very far from being reached in normal use (see Stacked CPU monitor (normal use)) ...Even with 5 CPUs up to 100%, it just reached 500/4800=1/10 of the height of the monitor... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
