https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405235
--- Comment #21 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- In the first section we look for possible deleted albums or whether digiKam albums have just been moved. That means we read the database and look directly in the collection to see whether the folder still exists, if not it is deleted from the database. This process is currently not counted in the progress display. This is so fast on local drives that it is unnecessary. It would also only effect a few percent in the ad, because, for example, with 5,000 albums against 100,000 images, it would be around 5 percent. In the second section, the change date of the albums is now determined and compared with the DB and a scan is initiated if necessary; this is recorded by the progress display. It is not so easy to combine both sections. A cache might still be possible so that we don't have to look twice at the network collection folders ... Comparing how fast console tools are when listing a network collection, I think we are now almost at the end of the optimization. Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
