https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254779
--- Comment #3 from David Zaslavsky <diaz...@ellipsix.net> --- OK, I'll make those changes and try to submit the patch to Reviewboard once I'm done. I didn't change the storage model (the part that fails the "wtf test") because I thought it best to limit my changes to those actually necessary to add the feature. But since you mentioned it, I will look into changing the model, and if it works out, I'll include both changes in the revised patch. m_expiry was already declared as a private field of SearchResult; it was just never used before. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
