https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339330
--- Comment #3 from Paul Floyd <pjfl...@wanadoo.fr> --- I just tried this on FreeBSD 13 with clang 11 and gcc 10.3 and there were no errors. That's probably because the libc implementation has mutex protection, though I don't understand why I don't see any std::base<bool>::operator=(bool) hazards. I'll recheck on Fedora 34 that the second hazard I saw really came from the std::atomic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
