https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451203
--- Comment #2 from Natalie Clarius <natalie_clar...@yahoo.de> --- (In reply to Méven Car from comment #1) > There was no consensus or majority apparent for users who expressed their > opinions in their votes. > In fact most users who voted in the discussion seem to see the new behavior > as good, but this was no proper poll. Looks like we're seeing different votes counts then. But yes, it is not very representative of course. > We cannot make assumptions on how users are disciplined in creating > semantically relevant folders and storing only files relating to that. I don't follow along with how making the assumption that users are undisciplined is warranted then. > How about the Downloads folder ? > How about a Videos dirs containing subtitles ? > A document directory containing photos ? I would think that in all those cases, if that's where users find their original files then that's what most effectively indicates where the archive is coming from; more effective than "archive" at least. I don't think that someone who isn't confused by putting their subtitles in a video folder would be confused by an archive of the same name containing these files, or to have an archive consisting of downloaded files to be named "Downloads.zip". But of course I can only answer your questions from my own perspective. > I don't understand the workflow exactly. > It seems this can be achieved using a few rename F2 or using ark. > The change made this workflow less convenient for sure. > But we can't base behaviors on one user particular workflow. Sure. Hence this issue, to officially indicate interest and have a place for people to voice their opinion. If it turns out that noone supports a revert to the old behavior, then that's a valid outcome. > Relevant MR https://invent.kde.org/utilities/ark/-/merge_requests/101 Thanks. I think the preceding discussion addresses all arguments made there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
