https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451785

--- Comment #12 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com ---
Looking to your system and version listed previously, all is very old now. This
is not new from Ubuntu packaging which is weird at all. Also the new Snap
bundle is really a worse. It work for simple  and small applications, but with
something like digiKam which require to access to host system to delegate
operations, this is a very bad solution.

For other Linux system which use FlatPak, It's the same. Bad design, no check
of the real needs from applications developers. For ex, Kate editor team left
this king of packaging, because it's impossible to run the application at all,
or with to decrease the usability.  

This is why we started to work since many years now with AppImage bundle. It's
more simple and do not limit at all the access to the host system, excepted if
the user want to set this (it's the inverse with Snap and FlatPak and then...)

The AppImage bundle host all the libraries for the application and is open to
the system. All bundled libraries are _up_to_date_, compared to the Ubuntu
stuff... AppImage is just a file to make executable and run. It decompress in
memory a file system with a chrooted Linux hierarchy file system. Nothing is
installed, only the application settings is written to your home directory, as
the native version.

AppImage is not perfect, it had few limitation, but at least, digiKam work as
expected at 85% inside.

The advantage to the bundle solution is that we update it every day with last
changes performed in source code. It's very suitable to check step by step
fixes and improvements.

VoilĂ , as Maik said previously, before to run digiKam 7 instead 6, backup your
database, as the internal schema is upgraded. If you go back to digiKam 6, a
new database schema will not compatible.

Best

Gilles Caulier

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to