https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456850
tagwer...@innerjoin.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tagwer...@innerjoin.org
--- Comment #1 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to Rohitt Vashishtha from comment #0)
> OBSERVED RESULT
>
> /a/b is indexed.
When you say "ignore" in step 4, you are indexing "a" and have added "a/c" to
baloo's list of "excluded" folders?
If I do the same, I see baloo indexing the contents of "a/b" (can confirm with
"balooshow" and a testfile in folder b)
but baloo does *not* follow symlinks when indexing so it does not "dig down"
into a/c (see the Summary Bug 447119).
Baloo keeps track of files 'via' their device/inode numbers and tries to keep a
one-to-one relationship between this internal ID and the filename. A search, by
default, gives results for the canonical filename.
In this situation, adding an exclusion for a/c is not going to mean anything to
baloo.
So, I also see your "Observed Result" but I'm not sure I would expect your
"Expected Result" (and I think it would lead to even more confusion and wierd
edge cases as per Bug 447119)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
