https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462916
--- Comment #11 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to mahikeulbody from comment #10) > So, if both files have time zone, why the difference in the renaming ? > > > it is no problem in digiKam-8.0.0 to take over the time information from > > ExifTool [...] however it would then probably always be UTC. > > In fact, no ; you could use this syntax : exiftool "-filename<CreateDate" > -api=QuickTimeUTC > > Phil Harvey said : "According to the specification, integer-format QuickTime > date/time tags should be stored as UTC. Unfortunately, digital cameras often > store local time values instead (presumably because they don't know the time > zone). For this reason, by default ExifTool does not assume a time zone for > these values. However, if the QuickTimeUTC API option is set, then ExifTool > will assume these values are properly stored as UTC, and will convert them > to local time when extracting." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
