https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464017
--- Comment #3 from Andrius Štikonas <andr...@stikonas.eu> --- (In reply to Ian Turner from comment #2) > Actually, looking more closely at the resize2fs documentation, I think the > problem is that we are passing a negative number at all. And unfortunately, > I'm now unable to reproduce this issue. Yeah, I was just going to say that it shouldn't be negative number. Strangely that negative number is equal to 1,953,523,119 - 1,827,692,544, so the difference between final and current size. Do you remember whether you were trying to reduce it by a bit (1,953,523,119 -> 1,827,692,544) or by a lot 1,953,523,119 to 125830575 sectors? I.e. my guess is that maybe something went wrong and newLength() was -1 https://invent.kde.org/system/kpmcore/-/blob/master/src/jobs/resizefilesystemjob.cpp#L82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
