https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465850
--- Comment #5 from gudvinr+...@gmail.com --- (In reply to gudvinr+kde from comment #4) > I guess if it had 1.14844, there will be no issues with gaps no matter what > effective size is. Okay, I read docs for wp_fractional_scale_v1 and it uses numerator with denominator of 120. That's where 138 comes from because 138/120 is 1.15. There is no way to send 1.14844 through this protocol. It is probably a good thing because floating point numbers aren't great for representing exact values anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
