https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460169

--- Comment #10 from christian+...@ch-sc.de ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9)
> Christian, that seems like a slightly different issue, and I'm afraid I can
> confirm that it's intentional now.

Why do you think it's different? What is intended with this fix, is what I'm
experiencing now: stretch the icon to fill out the available space. Only
difference is, the direction, horizontally or vertically, but I would expect
the behaviour to be direction agnostic except explicitly made different.
Haven't looked at it so closely, but could be, idk.

I think, it was just overlooked, that the non-stretching behaviour could be
valid, too. and IMHO there should both be supported, maybe with an option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to