https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460169
--- Comment #10 from christian+...@ch-sc.de --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9) > Christian, that seems like a slightly different issue, and I'm afraid I can > confirm that it's intentional now. Why do you think it's different? What is intended with this fix, is what I'm experiencing now: stretch the icon to fill out the available space. Only difference is, the direction, horizontally or vertically, but I would expect the behaviour to be direction agnostic except explicitly made different. Haven't looked at it so closely, but could be, idk. I think, it was just overlooked, that the non-stretching behaviour could be valid, too. and IMHO there should both be supported, maybe with an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.