https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459273
--- Comment #10 from Manga Tengu <mangate...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to acc4commissions from comment #9)
> Isn't the thumbnail generation before the patch is technically more
> 'correct' way? Because the pixel data is still there on the layer even it
> it's transparent and invisible.
> Not that I have a big problem with the patch, but I liked the fact that I
> could judge the actual layer size with the thumbnail...
As a painter, I wouldn't care about this until I find my file is abnormally
heavy for all it contains.
Shouldn't the layer be resized when empty ?
Maybe a manual action could be triggered ("compress file") at user's will ?
Or a dev option to see the real size of the layer in the thumbnails.
For me, as a painter, having inefficient thumbnails is a real concern. I would
enjoy a file that is just as big as necessary and If I find my file too big
because I know of this issue I would crop the file if it shrinks its size.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
