https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471443
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham <n...@kde.org> --- Thanks. >From what I can see of that thread, there's no consensus that we're doing anything wrong. Some quotations from the thread: > if I recall correctly the current consensus there is “keep it working exactly > as-is” so the subject of changing its behavior is a good candidate for > discussion on this list. And the ensuing discussion resulted in statements like these: > It it's a system setting, then one should assume it's been set to the exact > value that the system wanted it to be. So if they'd wanted it rounded, they'd > have rounded it. > Looks inconclusive to me - no clear consensus either way. (I’m also not sure > if it's a bug - it’s just "the current behavior") > It it's a system setting, then one should assume it's been set to the exact > value that the system wanted it to be. So if they'd wanted it rounded, they'd > have rounded it. > The QT_ environment variables are often sharp tools, and do make it possible > to configure Qt in such a way that it appears broken. > > I’m not sure I see what KDE could realistically change here - given that they > want to continue to set QT_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTORS, also with fractional > factors since that works for most/many apps I don't see indications that the Qt developers view what we're doing as a misuse of the feature or a bug. I understand that you see it that way, and that's fine, but the Qt developers don't appear to share that viewpoint. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
