https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475850
--- Comment #6 from Joshua Goins <j...@redstrate.com> --- > > If you want the latest yt-dlp, that would be a distribution packaged > > plasmatube + mpv + yt-dlp. > I tried the Fedora 37 distro package first, but it is unable to display > channel content, which fails with > `qrc:/VideoGridItem.qml:58:9: QML Image: Error decoding: > https://yt.artemislena.eu/: Unsupported image format` I suspect that the package is simply outdated, because I believe in a certain version of PlasmaTube (I forget which, at the moment) channel content wouldn't display to due it being unimplemented. > I can file a separate issue about that if desired. In this case, don't file a bug as F37 is using 23.04 and we're no longer tagging releases for that version. However, if you can recreate it in 23.08 (like on Flatpak) then do please file a bug! > The problem with distro packages is, they're often a bit outdated, while > flatpak is a convenient way to get latest releases. > However, that's kind of outweighed if bundled deps fall outdated in return, > but I understand this might just be an intentional flatpak limitation. > If there were actual build instructions, I could perhaps build from source, > but I'm not used to kdesrc-build yet. Yeah that's kind of the crux of it, and a much bigger issue than PlasmaTube :D There's even applications can only be reasonably distributed via Flatpak due to their complex dependency chain (Bottles and Anki come to mind) which complicate the situation even further. Don't feel pressured to have to build the package from kdesrc-build as it's quite involved - especially with our Qt6 transition making it more complicated - but testing from source is always appreciated. Ideally, Flatpak and distribution packages should be par-on-par. One of the least argued aspects of Flatpak is that it's fortunately quickly to distribute bugfixes like this! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
