https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349785
--- Comment #36 from Matthias <shaloksha...@protonmail.ch> --- I feel like this is bad communication by now. First, I invested quite some time into tracking and documenting half a dozen issues related to "windows can cover" and it does seem, it is essentially unmaintained for quite some time now. If it was clear that it was gonna be discontinued, a little note could have helped, at least when I issued the first "windows can cover issue" Then, you seem to discontinue one feature, to introduce another one that does almost the same thing: I don't see the point here at all. How is "hiding" different from "can be covered" Does it animate the hide? I am a bit puzzled, as to what I should expect. To me, that smells like the previous version was just a messy implementation, and now we are launching the same product under a different name to address that. Also in order to clarify the state for other contributors as well, I would welcome a public statement around that issue, thanks a lot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
