https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479854
Stephane MANKOWSKI <steph...@mankowski.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NOT A BUG |---
--- Comment #6 from Stephane MANKOWSKI <steph...@mankowski.fr> ---
(In reply to vicnet from comment #5)
> Thank you for the explanation on the date modification in sub-operations. It
> is clearer.
>
> > The check in "Advice" and corresponding "Align sub-operation date..." is
> > ONLY for operation with only one suboperation.
>
> Euh, strange remark or I don't understand.
> Sub-operations are useful when a operation is composed with multiple
> bub-operations.
> Otherwise it is the same (from user point of view) and it is a standard
> operation.
>From a user point of view, you are right.
In skrooge and operation is a set of suboperation.
A standard operation has only one suboperation.
A split operation has more than one operations.
>
> Nevertheless, this does not resolve the bug that if I apply the tool 'align
> subop' on any operation (even with future dates in sub(operation), it should
> do the job, or at least it should signal the pb in a warning (orange msg).
The tool "Align subop" is working only for standard operations because this
doesn't make sens to have different date on operation and suboperation.
This tool doesn't work on split operation because misalignment is not a "bug",
this is a feature.
But I can understand your remark and do this proposal:
- The advice is done only on standard operations to detect them because this
doesn't make sens.
- Tool "Align subop" is done on detected standard operations when called from
the advice.
- Tool "Align subop" is done on all selected operations (standard or spli) when
called from a selection.
Do you validate this proposal ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
