https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069

--- Comment #6 from Flossy Cat <flossy-...@online.de> ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5)
> Got it, thanks. I can see how that would be useful for powerful custom
> workflows.

Glad to be of service.

Anyhow, my counterquestion was not rhetorical, but in earnest. I really think
it worth answering, because together we have just demonstrated that a valuable
and powerful feature was removed on a whim without checking its user base and
its UX value:

How does KDE know which features are unused and how is removal decided?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to