https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069
--- Comment #6 from Flossy Cat <flossy-...@online.de> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > Got it, thanks. I can see how that would be useful for powerful custom > workflows. Glad to be of service. Anyhow, my counterquestion was not rhetorical, but in earnest. I really think it worth answering, because together we have just demonstrated that a valuable and powerful feature was removed on a whim without checking its user base and its UX value: How does KDE know which features are unused and how is removal decided? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.