https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352896
--- Comment #27 from RJVB <rjvber...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Sergio Martins from comment #25) > but we're not linking to libLLVM.dylib, it's all static libs.. so why is > that needed ? Or the static libs are also versioned ? Well, no, I'm getting dynamic libs. Maybe it depends on how llvm and clang were built? In fact, it seems that linking libLLVM isn't even required, is that possible?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
