https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490520
--- Comment #4 from Vedant Paranjape <vedant.paranj...@amd.com> ---
(In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #3)
> I've been using LLVM compilers for several years without any issues.
>
> Are you seeing configure passing this test:
>
> # does the x86/amd64 assembler understand the LOOPNEL instruction?
> # Note, this doesn't generate a C-level symbol. It generates a
> # automake-level symbol (BUILD_LOOPNEL_TESTS), used in test Makefile.am's
> AC_MSG_CHECKING([if x86/amd64 assembler supports 'loopnel'])
>
> AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[]], [[
> do {
> __asm__ __volatile__("1: loopnel 1b\n");
> } while (0)
> ]])], [
> ac_have_as_loopnel=yes
> AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
> ], [
> ac_have_as_loopnel=no
> AC_MSG_RESULT([no])
> ])
>
> AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_LOOPNEL_TESTS], [test x$ac_have_as_loopnel = xyes])
>
> and hence none/tests/amd64/Makefile gets a rule to build the loopnel test,
> but then "make check" fails to build the loopnel testcase?
Yes you are right, that should not have gotten through. Let me check again,
maybe I am missing something.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
