https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481024
--- Comment #32 from Bernhard E. Reiter <bernh...@intevation.de> --- Dear @Flossy Cat, > I personally are very sick of this kind of discussion, of ill-advised > deprecations and functional regressions and the inherent lack of respect thus > expressed against the KDE user base it is sad to read about your frustrations with some KDE products like Kontact. I can relate because I've experienced regressions a number of times myself. It is good and helpful that you report that those missing or regressing features are very important to you. But also - as I see from your lines cited above - you come to the conclusion that those changes are deliberate and thus a disrespect towards you or users in general. Without knowing how those changes came to be in detail, you cannot know that. I don't know either, but how would you react to a user of your software that approaches you with this conclusion that you meant "ill" by making a change without knowing that you may have been forced to do it by some technical circumstances or budget limitations? Is that reaction helpful? All desktop email clients struggle with getting enough workforce behind them, either by volunteers or professionals. To me that is a wider structural problem. You were asking for alternatives, I know of Claws mail which has is a small but long term team behind it. And Kontact3 from Trinity which has the user defined snoozing still in. Have you tried any of those? Best Regards Bernhard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
