https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402346
--- Comment #13 from Michael Miller <michael_mil...@msn.com> --- Gilles and Maik, Should we be using QStandardPaths::AppConfigLocation instead of QStandardPaths::GenericConfigLocation? >From the Qt docs: > QStandardPaths::GenericConfigLocation Returns a directory location where > user-specific configuration files shared between multiple applications should > be written. This is a generic value and the returned path is never empty. > QStandardPaths::AppConfigLocation Returns a directory location where > user-specific configuration files should be written. This is an > application-specific directory, and the returned path is never empty. This > enum value was added in Qt 5.5. https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qstandardpaths.html We could easily add some code to check for the old config file location and move it when people upgrade. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
