https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320666
Mario Frank <mario.fr...@uni-potsdam.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.fr...@uni-potsdam.de --- Comment #2 from Mario Frank <mario.fr...@uni-potsdam.de> --- (In reply to parejaobregon from comment #1) > This would indeed improve fuzzy searches (by image) a lot! > > Consider also the following user scenario: I want to search in my collection > for a specific kind of images (for example bridges, sunsets, etc), but I > have no clue where to look for. I could make a simple web search for the > subject, temporarily download a similar image to the one I'm looking for, > and drag and drop it into digikam fuzzy search. This way I have all the > bridges in my collection in no time :) > > Anyway, thanks for the hard work! Hey, I think this is a quite nice feature though there is a workaround: 1) create a "staging"-album for those pictures 2) drag the pictures into the album 3) Trigger fuzzy search via context menu. But as noted out, the shorter was may be more nice. Thus, I made some research and some tests concerning this feature request. I have a working solution but I am not satisfied. In DK, the fuzzy and duplicates searches are based on the images as defined by the database structure. It is possible to implement such feature without using the internal data structure. But I assume this is no clean solution. I think the most clean way would be to create a temporary image data structure from the provided URI. I just did not find something appropriate in the API. Perhaps, this does not even exist. But even if I create temporary image data structures, they should not have the normal image ids since I do not want to waste ids. Some comments from the established devs concerning the technical details? Cheers, Mario -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.