Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 20:27 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > A Dijous 29 Juny 2006 20:23, Wilfried Huss va escriure: > > Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 19:38 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > > A Dijous 29 Juny 2006 17:45, Wilfried Huss va escriure: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 13:57 schrieb Pino Toscano: > > > > > Alle 13:41, giovedì 29 giugno 2006, Laurent Montel ha scritto: > > > > > > There is two cmake file which allows to search poppler-qt4: > > > > > > One into kdegraphics/cmake/module/FindPopplerQt4.cmake > > > > > > one into playground/graphics/cmake/modules/FindPoppler.cmake > > > > > > > > > > I am the author of the latter, and I planned to do that merge in case > > > > > of a moving of okular to kdegraphics. > > > > > > > > > > > I will want to move one into kdelibs (because it duplicates) > > > > > > > > > > > > One which is into playground search poppler-qt4 >= 0.5.2 so I will > > > > > > add it into kdelibs and I will want to rename it as > > > > > > FindPopplerQt4.cmake because it's a better name for it (and renamed > > > > > > variable to add qt4 suffix) > > > > > > > > > > > > Can I make it ? > > > > > > > > > > Actually, there's a small issue: okular stricly requires Poppler-Qt4 > > > > > >= 0.5.3 (yes, I have to update it) and this dependancy could raise > > > > > if there will be new features needed for okular, while any other > > > > > application that uses Poppler-Qt4 (kfile-pdf, kviewshell, krita > > > > > maybe?) just want it with no particular requires on its version. > > > > > > > > kviewshell also needs the latest cvs snapshot of poppler, but the > > > > version is not checked in the cmake file in kdegraphics. > > > > > > But the pdf kfile-plugin does not, it would not make sense disabling its > > > compilation when you have poppler 0.5 for example. Can this be done with > > > the cmake framework? And if it can, how? > > > > I don't think that is really an issue. Until KDE4 is released there is most > > likely a stable poppler 0.6 or even 0.8. And anyone that wants to install > > KDE4 will need to have a very uptodate base system anyway. > > > > > Anyway i obviously agree duplication is bad. > > > > Well, the duplication that is happening with kviewshell and okular is much > > worse than having the same cmake file in two places. But this is a > > different topic. > > Yeah i think i should inmediately stop coding okular
No, you shouldn't. But having the complete DVI-rendering code two times in SVN is a much greater maintainance problem, than a duplicated cmake file. Besides, okular's fork of the DVI code has thrown away 9 years of commit history. This is also a problem. I thougt KDE switched to SVN so that such things would not happen again. > (not that i do much > really, Pino is the master at the moment), i might even write some mails to > tell gnome dudes to stop doing gnome because we have KDE and freebsd, netbsd, > openbsd hackers to stop because we already have linux so who wants to have > another kernel, dude, probably i even will send a polite mail to yahoo CEO to > tell them to shup up their business because Google is doing better than them > in all aspects. Please, don't be so dramatic. > BTW this is not the right mailing list to discuss that. Greetings, Wilfried _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list Kde-buildsystem@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem