On Friday 27 July 2007 17:09, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007 11:42, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Friday, 27. July 2007, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > this is the workaround we came up with to get kdepim building again.
> > > > This smells like a cmake bug, that it doesn't respect target name
> > > > here. any better idea on how to fix it?
> > >
> > > You mean export_library_dependencies() ignores the OUTPUT_NAME target
> > > property ?
> >
> > Yes, thats how it looks like to me.
> >
> > > I'll check tomorrow.
> >
> > Thanks :)
>
> Yes, that's the case.
> It may be that there are some more issues with OUTPUT_NAME for libraries.
> Even if the fix would go into the next cmake release (2.4.8, but 2.4.7 has
> just been released last week), it wouldn't help us, because we can't
> require it.
> I think this means we cannot have "+" in library names.

Ok, we can with workarounds like the one you did, but I think we shouldn't (in 
order to avoid more potential problems).

Bye
Alex
_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
Kde-buildsystem@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem

Reply via email to