Quick update: I just committed this in trunk (1089130) with a slightly modified patch that doesn't touch any public headers.
If no objections arise, I will backport this change in 4.4 branch on Monday. On Thursday 11 February 2010 19:02:16 Dario Freddi wrote: > Hello list, > > After seeing that ldd'ing libkdecore gives out quite a lot of things due to > KAuth + polkit-1, I decided it could be a good thing to move backend > handling to a dynamic plugin architecture, so I did it (patch attached). > > I think this approach is better, it does not change anything in API/ABI > (the only change in public headers is that now a function is exported), I > tested it and works quite well. > > I was wondering if such a change is ok (I still did not commit it) and if > it's eligible for a backport to 4.4. -- ------------------- Dario Freddi KDE Developer GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
