On Thursday, 2014-01-16, 22:54:43, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dijous, 16 de gener de 2014, a les 22:13:58, Kevin Krammer va escriure: > > On Thursday, 2014-01-16, 22:07:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Can you start it from the command line? > > > > plasma-windowed can be run from the commandline, e.g. > > plasma-windowed org.kde.networkmanagement > > That's a bit too long vs "kcalc", but i guess you could always install a > shell script file in /usr/bin/kcalc that just runs "plasma-windowed > org.kde.calculator" inside. Right. Or I imagine that there could be a PlasmaAppletView class or similar that can be used in a small launcher executable int main(..) { // create app PlasmaAppletViewer viewer("org.kde.calc"); viewer.show(); return app.exec(); } > So basically there's no difference between a plasmoid and a non-plasmoid? Not in this case. Aaron mentioned that the stand-alone case might need some extras like menu support. > If that's the case, I don't understand why John started the discussion if we > should favor plasmoids over non-plasmoids or viceversa since it seems to me > "plasmoid or not" is an implementation detail. I guess is was mostly a question of UI technology being used. However, this becomes less and less a separation factor. An application core that was designed for QML based UI can be used unchanged in a widget UI, QtQuick UI, Plasma UI, BB10/Cascades UI, etc. The videos of the talks of this year's Qt DevDays will hopefully be uploaded soon, Tobias König and I demonstrated that with a simple app, using widgets and BB10/Cascades as the two UIs :) Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community