Then I think that all these kmail 1 bugs should be moved en masse to
kmail2. Either they are useful for kmail2, or they are not; if they are
not, they should be closed as unmaintained, and if they are, they are
kmail2 bugs.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, laurent Montel wrote:
Le Sunday 11 January 2015 23:33:09 Luigi Toscano a écrit :
Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto:
I guess we should also be really careful, as you said some software is
"done"
and the fact that it didn't get any development doesn't mean it should be
killed.
Of course. But kmail (not kmail2) is _dead_. It's bugs should be closed.
I would ask Laurent first. He said in the past that the UI part of
kmail2 is really close to kmail1. Are those bugs "real" bugs and not
wishlists, right?
Hi,
Indeed Kmail1 is dead, but some bugs associate to kmail1 can be reproduce in
kmail2 and in the past I fixed some kmail1 bugs
(All wishlist in kmail1 were closed or moved to kmail2)
After that I don't want to see all kmail1 bug removed from bugzilla, as I
write some bug can be reproduce in kmail2
So please don't close them.
Regards.
Ciao
--
Laurent Montel | laurent.mon...@kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.fr
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
