> alternatives. Just as they do not have access to my personal inbox > where much corresponse often happens, and patches are discussed.
Not sure that this is a statement you want to advertise, since it implies that the development happens behind the closed doors. (yes, we all do that sometimes, but is should not be a part of our workflow, and not something we should be proud of) Now, with GitHub, it would not be exactly 'development behind the closed doors' but for a lot of us it would be basically the same. As Martin mentioned, this would be hidden from his eyes since he has no intention to follow development on GitHub. > Nor would we be depending on GitHub. We would still have our own > infrastructure, which we would be recommending. If something happened to GH, all the discussions regarding patches (that went through it) would be lost. So, it is not like Krita's Windows binaries - if Windows went away, we would lose nothing. Cheers, Ivan Cheerio, Ivan -- KDE, ivan.cu...@kde.org, http://cukic.co/ gpg key id: 850B6F76 _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
