On 09/19/2015 06:53 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 06:44:24 PM Martin Graesslin wrote: >> No reality would be that it slowly moves code review from KDE to github. And >> I think we have here quite some people in the discussion who would love to >> see that > > I don't think anyone ever thought that... o.o
No, I think the stance is more 'I wouldn't mind that if it gets us more hands and I don't think it will make our soft- ware less free or less useful'. The people on the other side of the argument either don't want to work with proprietary tools period, or think two review sites are too many and we obviously can't give up the free one, or think the long-term cost to KDE's credi- bility is too high, or think it would alter the developer community's demographics over time to where some of the core values get lost, or have concerns about tooling availability and data lock-in, or have concerns about shrinking KDE's scope by outsourcing infrastructure competence over time. Both positions are non-trivial and difficult to bridge. Cheers, Eike _______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
