Adriaan de Groot ha scritto: > I don't think votes are the way to go, really. I'd much rather just get on > with it. For the FreeBSD project on KDE's phab, I didn't even think about it: > I'm a KDE person, I'm interested in delivering KDE software to a particular > group, and I do lots of things on KDE infrastructure for doing that delivery > (e.g. filing bugs, writing patches, blogging, running KDE CI for FreeBSD), > and > sysadmin suggested having a Phab project for it would be useful to group > things. Yeah, sure. > > I don't see, given the *tiny* technical burden implied by the request in this > thread, why Kubuntu should be any different from FreeBSD.
There is a slight difference: FreeBSD (but the same can be said for Windows or Android) is a completely different platform and the "FreeBSD" project/tag on phabricator.kde.org can be used to identify which reviews and changes are relevant for that port. The fact that you can organize the tasks and review is a side effect of this reason, and that's why I proposed the creation of the tag (as Community Administrator, not exactly an official sysadmin :) I think this is different from *ubuntu (and Fedora, Debian, Opensuse, Arch, Gentoo, Chakra, Slackware, etc etc) which are GNU/Linux distributions, all (with "minimal" differences) the same platform (and probably the most tested). -- Luigi