On Friday, 10 February 2017 14:54:52 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I'd like to get back to my proposed update of the KDE licence policy > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy/Draft > > I got some comments from Matija Šuklje which I incorporated and it now > includes a handy changelog. > > [...] > -Documentation to be CC-BY-SA 4
I stand by my previous position (have dual license FDL in its fully free version/dfsg version + CC-BY_SA 4) but if I'm the only one it means that we have only the painful way of finding contributors no more active for 10+ years and try to relicense. We seriously risk to lose a lot of documentation this way. Would we allowed to keep the documents with old license and apply this only to new one? > The main change is for docs and other non-code files to become > CC-BY-SA 4. This [...] and allows us to share with other popular > sources such as wikipedia. It does not change your proposal but this specific point is incorrect: Wikipedia is dual licensed even now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Wikipedia:Copyrights -- Luigi