On 4 July 2017 at 13:20, Jonathan Riddell <j...@jriddell.org> wrote: > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft > > Jonathan >
Hi Looking good. One thing: is there life after "unmaintained"? Why not? I can imagine we can make the process more dynamic. Whole apps or their parts can go back to being maintained, what seems to be a core property of FOSS. If so how about back-arrow from Unmaintained? -- regards, Jaroslaw Staniek KDE: : A world-wide network of software engineers, artists, writers, translators : and facilitators committed to Free Software development - http://kde.org Calligra Suite: : A graphic art and office suite - http://calligra.org Kexi: : A visual database apps builder - http://calligra.org/kexi Qt Certified Specialist: : http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek